The difference of the concept of «diseas»" in the context of public health : (part 2 – experimental research)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2023.01.004Keywords:
public health, objective and subjective health, the concept of disease, morbidity of the populationAbstract
Target. From the standpoint of public health, determine and analyze the ratio of various components of health disorders, namely biometric (disease), social (sickness), and its self-esteem (illness). Materials and methods. The source of the initial information was the survey data of the adult population. All questionnaire questions related to three manifestations of the health disorders: "disease", "illness", "sickness. Mathematical methods were used for the integral assessment of the components of health disorders, determination of the relationship between them and analysis of the obtained results. Results. For public health, which is the most socially oriented branch of medicine, it is extremely important to take into account not only biomedical (disease), but also social (sickness) aspects of the disease, as well as its self-esteem (illness). In this research, we considered the combination and relationship of various manifestations of the disease in Tweddle's triad, and conducted a comparative analysis of its components. It was established that the relationships between various forms of ill health depend on both the age and gender of the respondents. This must be considered, because knowledge of the ratio and relationship of the components of Tweddle's triad is necessary for the development of the most effective ways to overcome diseases and improve health. Considering the components of Tweddle's triad, namely, disease, illness and sickness, is extremely important for medicine, social policy and the health care system in general.Downloads
References
1. Boyd K.M. Disease, illness, sickness, health, healing and wholeness: Exploring some elusive concepts. Med Humanit. 2000. Vol. 26 (1). Р. 9–17. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1136/mh.26.1.9
2. Gourbin C., Wunsch G. From prevention to cure which policies for primary care? Bulletin de la Classe des lettres et des sciences morales et politiques. 2005. Vol.16, №1-6. P. 99-109. DOI : https://doi.org/10.3406/barb.2005.23700
3. Булич Э., Муравов И. Парадоксы и проблемы здоровья или Возможна ли другая парадигма медицины? : монография. Palmarium Academic Publishing, 2015. 147 с.
4. Wills J., Naidoo J. Foundations for Health Promotion. Elsevier, 2016. 340 р.
5. Cho J., Martin P., Margrett J., MacDonald M., Poon L.W. The Relationship between Physical Health and Psychological Well-Being among Oldest-Old Adults. Journal of Aging Research. 2011. Vol. 2011. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/605041
6. Wel K., Dahl E., Thielen K. Social Inequalities in “Sickness”: Does Welfare State Regime Type Make a Difference? A Multilevel Analysis of Men and Women in 26 European Countries. International Journal of Health Services. 2012. Vol. 42(2). P. 235-255. DOI : https://doi.org/10.2190/HS.42.2.f
7. Горбаль І.С. Відчуття суб’єктивного благополуччя як передумова та втілення психологічного здоров’я особистості. Науковий вісник Львівського державного університету внутрішніх справ. 2012. №2 (2). С.293-303.
8. Bennett K.M. Social engagement as a longitudinal predictor of objective and subjective health. Eur J Ageing. 2005. №2(1). Р. 48-55. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-005-0501-z
9. Viljanen A., Salminen M., Irjala K. et al. Subjective and objective health predicting mortality and institutionalization: an 18-year population-based follow-up study among community-dwelling Finnish older adults. BMC Geriatr. 2021. №21. Article number 358. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02311-w
10. Forward S. State of the art report on Life Quality assessment in the field of transport and mobility. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute. Linkoeping, 2003. URL : https://www.academia.edu/7421178/
11. Johnston D.V., Propper C., Shields M.A. Comparing Subjective and Objective Measures of Health: Evidence from Hypertension for the Income/Health Gradient. Institute for the Study of Labor, IZA DP No. 2737. 2007. DOI : https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.982154
12. Бердник О.В., Полька Н.С., Добрянська О.В., Рудницька О.П., Скочкo Т.П. Дитяче населення крізь призму громадського здоров’я. K. : Медінформ, 2020. 200 с.
13. Hofmann B. Disease, Illness, and Sickness. The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Medicine. 2016. №2. P. 16-26. URL : https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9781315720739.ch2
14. Бердник О.В., Скочко Т.П., Добрянська О.В., Рудницька О.П. Багатовимірність поняття «хвороба» у контексті громадського здоров’я (частина 1 – теоретичне дослідження). Довкілля та здоров’я. 2022. №3. С. 4-11. DOI : https://doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2022.03.004
15. Антомонов М.Ю., Коробейніков Г.В., Хмельницька І.В., Харковлюк-Балакіна Н.В. Математичні методи оброблення та моделювання результатів експериментальних досліджень: навчальний посібник. К. : Олімпійська література, 2021. 216 с.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Environment & Health
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
