ENVIRONMENTAL VIBRATION AND PUBLIC HEALTH: A SCOPING REVIEW OF HEALTH EFFECTS, EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT, AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES

S.S. Halak; P.V. Semashko; A.P. Bezverkha; Ye.A. Serdiuk; O.V. Gots

doi:10.32402/

Authors

S.S. Halak State Institution “Marzieiev Institute for Public Health of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9502-7198 Author
P.V. Semashko State Institution “Marzieiev Institute for Public Health of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3075-4245 Author
A.P. Bezverkha State Institution “Marzieiev Institute for Public Health of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5362-2899 Author
Ye.A. Serdiuk State Institution “Marzieiev Institute for Public Health of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4947-6045 Author
O.V. Gots State Institution “Marzieiev Institute for Public Health of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine”, Kyiv, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6044-343X Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32402/

Keywords:

environmental vibration, public health, railway vibration, annoyance, sleep disturbance, exposure assessment, prevention.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. To systematically map and synthesize current evidence on the effects of environmental vibration on populations, methods of exposure assessment, exposure–response relationships, regulatory approaches, and preventive strategies, and to identify the main gaps in the evidence base from a public health perspective.

MATERIALS AND METHODS. A scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology, with reporting guided by PRISMA-ScR and PRISMA-S. PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from database inception through 24 August 2026, supplemented by citation searching. Eligibility criteria were structured according to the PCC (Population–Concept–Context) framework. Twenty-four publications were included in the empirical synthesis and grouped into 13 research clusters; regulatory and methodological sources were analyzed separately.

RESULTS. The most developed evidence base concerned railway vibration. The most consistent exposure–response relationships were observed for annoyance. Field and laboratory studies also support associations between nocturnal vibration and sleep disturbance, cortical arousals, awakenings, and acute changes in heart rate; in some experiments, vibration effects were observed independently of noise. Evidence for psychological and cognitive symptoms remains emerging and limited, and adequate prospective data on clinically manifest chronic diseases were not identified. Exposure assessment methods were heterogeneous and included RMS, VDV, v_w,95, VdB, PPV, maximum frequency-weighted measures, and modelled exposure. Regulatory systems are primarily oriented toward comfort, annoyance, or structural safety rather than quantitative assessment of long-term health risk.

CONCLUSIONS. Environmental vibration should be regarded as a physical stressor relevant to public health, with the strongest evidence for annoyance and sleep disturbance. Priorities include standardizing exposure assessment, jointly evaluating noise and vibration, investigating nocturnal exposure, vulnerable populations, and long-term clinical outcomes, and preventing exposure through spatial and transport planning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Seidler A, Schubert M, Mehrjerdian Y, Krapf K, Popp C, van Kamp I, et al. Health effects of railway-induced vibration combined with railway noise–a systematic review with exposure-effect curves. Environ Res. 2023;233:116480.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2023.116480

2. Seidler A, Schubert M, Mehrjerdian Y, Krapf K, Popp C, van Kamp I, et al. Corrigendum to “Health effects of railway-induced vibration combined with railway noise–a systematic review with exposure-effect curves” [Environ Res. 233 (2023) 116480]. Environ Res. 2024;251(Pt 1):118658.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118658

3. Peters MDJ, Marnie C, Tricco AC, Pollock D, Munn Z, Alexander L, et al. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evid Synth. 2020;18(10):2119–26.

doi: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-20-00167

4. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–73.

doi: https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850

5. Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):39.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z

6. Barker TH, Hasanoff S, Aromataris E, Stone JC, Leonardi-Bee J, Sears K, et al. The revised JBI critical appraisal tool for the assessment of risk of bias for analytical cross-sectional studies. JBI Evid Synth. 2026;24(3):401–8.

doi: https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-24-00523

7. Klæboe R, Turunen-Rise IH, Hårvik L, Madshus C. Vibration in dwellings from road and rail traffic–Part II: exposure-effect relationships based on ordinal logit and logistic regression models. Appl Acoust. 2003;64(1):89–109.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(02)00053-1

8. Sica G, Peris E, Woodcock JS, Moorhouse AT, Waddington DC. Design of measurement methodology for the evaluation of human exposure to vibration in residential environments. Sci Total Environ. 2014;482–483:461–71.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.006

9. Waddington DC, Woodcock J, Peris E, Condie J, Sica G, Moorhouse AT, et al. Human response to vibration in residential environments. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;135(1):182–93.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4836496

10. Sharp C, Woodcock J, Sica G, Peris E, Moorhouse AT, Waddington DC. Exposure-response relationships for annoyance due to freight and passenger railway vibration exposure in residential environments. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;135(1):205–12.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4836115

11. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Ögren M, Jerson T, Öhrström E. Railway noise annoyance and the importance of number of trains, ground vibration, and building situational factors. Noise Health. 2012;14(59):190–201.

doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/1463-1741.99895

12. Ögren M, Gidlöf-Gunnarsson A, Smith M, Gustavsson S, Persson Waye K. Comparison of annoyance from railway noise and railway vibration. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(7):805.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070805

13. Maclachlan L, Ögren M, van Kempen E, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Persson Waye K. Annoyance in response to vibrations from railways. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9):1887.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091887

14. Vincens N, van Kempen E, Ögren M, Persson Waye K. Living close to railways: cross-sectional analysis of ground-borne vibrations and vibration annoyance. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2024;136:104458.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2024.104458

15. Rafidah M, Mohd Lazi MKA, Padil KH, Hassan SA, Sulaiman N. Assessing the impact of railway traffic types on human annoyance in residential area due to ground-borne vibrations. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2025;32(34):20714–36.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-025-36841-2

16. Arnberg PW, Bennerhult O, Eberhardt JL. Sleep disturbances caused by vibrations from heavy road traffic. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990;88(3):1486–93.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400305

17. Smith MG, Croy I, Ögren M, Persson Waye K. On the influence of freight trains on humans: a laboratory investigation of the impact of nocturnal low frequency vibration and noise on sleep and heart rate. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55829.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055829

18. Croy I, Smith MG, Persson Waye K. Effects of train noise and vibration on human heart rate during sleep: an experimental study. BMJ Open. 2013;3(5):e002655.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002655

19. Smith MG, Croy I, Hammar O, Persson Waye K. Vibration from freight trains fragments sleep: a polysomnographic study. Sci Rep. 2016;6:24717.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24717

20. Smith MG, Croy I, Ögren M, Hammar O, Lindberg E, Persson Waye K. Physiological effects of railway vibration and noise on sleep. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017;141(5):3262–9.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4983302

21. Persson Waye K, Smith MG, Hussain-Alkhateeb L, Koopman A, Ögren M, Peris E, et al. Assessing the exposure-response relationship of sleep disturbance and vibration in field and laboratory settings. Environ Pollut. 2019;245:558–67.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.09.082

22. Maclachlan L, Persson Waye K, Pedersen E. Exploring perception of vibrations from rail: an interview study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(11):1303.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111303

23. Morihara T, Yokoshima S, Matsumoto Y. Effects of noise and vibration due to the Hokuriku Shinkansen Railway on the living environment: a socio-acoustic survey one year after the opening. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(15):7794.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18157794

24. Sadeghi J, Nourollahi H, Sadeghi V. Evaluation of conventional floor-to-floor prediction models for train-induced noise and vibration and their association with residents’ depressive symptoms. Noise Health. 2026;28(131):511–22.

doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_20_26

25. Sadeghi J, Nourollahi H, Sadeghi V. Underground metro-induced noise versus vibration: a comparative assessment of impacts on people’s mental health dimensions. Sustain Cities Soc. 2026;145:107473.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2026.107473

26. Nguyen Thanh Tung, Matsumoto Y, Yokoshima S, Morihara T, Hayashi K. Indoor discomfort from ground transportation traffic vibration and noise–comparison between Vietnamese and Japanese young participants. J Acoust Soc Am. 2026;159(6):4832–42.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0043936

27. Peris E, Woodcock J, Sica G, Sharp C, Moorhouse AT, Waddington DC. Effect of situational, attitudinal and demographic factors on railway vibration annoyance in residential areas. J Acoust Soc Am. 2014;135(1):194–204.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4836495

28. Howarth HVC, Griffin MJ. The annoyance caused by simultaneous noise and vibration from railways. J Acoust Soc Am. 1991;89(5):2317–23.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.400922

29. Yokoshima S, Morihara T, Sato T, Yano T. Combined effects of high-speed railway noise and ground vibrations on annoyance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(8):845.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14080845

30. Wong-McSweeney D, Woodcock JS, Peris E, Waddington DC, Moorhouse AT, Redel-Macías MD. Human annoyance, acceptability and concern as responses to vibration from the construction of Light Rapid Transit lines in residential environments. Sci Total Environ. 2016;568:1308–14.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.121

31. Connolly DP, Marecki GP, Kouroussis G, Thalassinakis I, Woodward PK. The growth of railway ground vibration problems—a review. Sci Total Environ. 2016;568:1276–82.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.101

32. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Environmental noise guidelines for the European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018. 160 p.

33. International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration and shock–Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration–Part 2: Vibration in buildings (1 Hz to 80 Hz) (ISO 2631-2:2026). 3rd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2026.

34. International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration and shock–Evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration–Part 1: General requirements (ISO 2631-1:1997). 2nd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 1997.

35. British Standards Institution. Guide to evaluation of human exposure to vibration in buildings. Part 1: Vibration sources other than blasting (BS 6472-1:2008). London: British Standards Institution; 2008.

doi: https://doi.org/10.3403/19971044

36. Standards Norway. Vibration and shock–Measurement of vibration in buildings from land-based transport, vibration classification and guidance to evaluation of effects on human beings (NS 8176:2017). Oslo: Standards Norway; 2017.

37. Deutsches Institut für Normung. Vibrations in buildings–Part 2: Effects on persons in buildings (DIN 4150-2:2025-08). Berlin: DIN Media; 2025.

doi: https://doi.org/10.31030/3613483

38. Quagliata A, Shumway MA, Boeker E, Roof C, Meister L, Singleton HL. Transit noise and vibration impact assessment manual. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration; 2018. FTA Report No. 0123.

doi: https://doi.org/10.21949/1503619

39. International Organization for Standardization. Mechanical vibration and shock–Vibration of fixed structures–Guidelines for the measurement of vibrations and evaluation of their effects on structures (ISO 4866:2010). 2nd ed. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2010.

40. Deutsches Institut für Normung. Vibrations in buildings–Part 3: Effects on structures (DIN 4150-3:2016-12). Berlin: DIN Media; 2016.

doi: https://doi.org/10.31030/2579353